Emissions from conventional and electronic waterpipes relative to cigarettes and a heated tobacco product / Peter J. Wilkinson (2024)  

Public Titre : Emissions from conventional and electronic waterpipes relative to cigarettes and a heated tobacco product Type de document : document électronique Auteurs : Peter J. Wilkinson, Auteur ; A Clarke, Auteur ; Ian M. Fearon, Auteur ; Ronan Barry, Auteur Editeur : Springer Nature Année de publication : 2024 Collection : Scientific Reports Importance : p. 1-16 Présentation : graph.; tab. Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : [TABAC] chimie du tabac:substance toxique [TABAC] chimie du tabac:tabac fumé:chicha [TABAC] étude [TABAC] tabagisme:risque Index. décimale : TA 1.1.4 Chicha – Narguilé Résumé : Harms associated with tobacco product use, including waterpipe, are due to inhalational exposure to toxicants either present in tobacco or formed during the process of combustion. We assessed levels of 37 toxicants in aerosol emissions from conventional waterpipe heated with different charcoals and also with a heat management device (HMD), from the IQOS heated tobacco product (HTP), and the ‘OOKA’ electronic waterpipe. We also utilised literature data on toxicant yields in 3R4F reference cigarette smoke. When taking use patterns into account, toxicant yields were substantially lower in conventional waterpipe aerosol compared with cigarette smoke. Toxicant yields in electronic waterpipe aerosol were substantially lower than those in conventional waterpipe aerosol, both on a per session basis and when taking typical use patterns into account. Numerous toxicants in conventional waterpipe aerosol were absent in electronic waterpipe aerosol. In summary, during typical use conventional waterpipe emits fewer, and lower levels of, a number of toxicants relative to combustible cigarette smoke. In addition, electronically heating shisha further reduces toxicant levels, and many toxicants are absent in OOKA electronic waterpipe aerosol. These findings have important implications concerning toxicant exposure among waterpipe users, and for understanding how to potentially reduce health risks associated with waterpipe use. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4637991/v1 Format de la ressource électronique : Article en ligne Permalink : https://biblio.fares.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=10498

Aucun avis, veuillez vous identifier pour ajouter le vôtre !

Legislative smoking bans for reducing secondhand smoke exposure / K. Frazer (2016)  

Public Titre : Legislative smoking bans for reducing secondhand smoke exposure : smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption (review) Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : K. Frazer, ; A Clarke, ; JE Callinan, ; J. McHugh, Auteur ; S. van Baarsel, Auteur ; A Clarke, Auteur ; K Doherty, Auteur ; C. Kelleher, Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Importance : 167 p. Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : TA 9.3.6 Protection des non-fumeurs Résumé : Background : Smoking bans have been implemented in a variety of settings, as well as being part of policy in many jurisdictions to protect the public and employees from the harmful effects of secondhand smoke (SHS). They also offer the potential to influence social norms and smoking behaviour of those populations they affect. Objectives : To assess the extent to which legislation-based smoking bans or restrictions reduce exposure to SHS, help people who smoke to reduce tobacco consumption or lower smoking prevalence and affect the health of those in areas which have a ban or restriction in place. Search strategy : We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group Specialised Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Conference Paper Index, and reference lists and bibliographies of included studies.We also checked websites of various organisations. Date of most recent search; July 1st 2009. Selection criteria : We considered studies that reported legislative smoking bans and restrictions affecting populations. The minimum standard was having a ban explicitly in the study and a minimum of six months follow up for measures of smoking behaviour. We included randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies (i.e. non-randomized controlled studies), controlled before and after studies, interruptedtime series as defined by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group, and uncontrolled pre- and post-ban data. Data collection and analysis : Characteristics and content of the interventions, participants, outcomes and methods of the included studies were extracted by one author and checked by a second. Because of heterogeneity in the design and content of the studies, we did not attempt a meta-analysis. We evaluated the studies using qualitative narrative synthesis. En ligne : https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005992.pub3/epdf/ful [...] Permalink : https://biblio.fares.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=7689

Exemplaires (1)

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
TA 002638	TA 9.3.6 CAL L	Article/Périodique	Bibliothèque FARES	Tabac	Consultation sur place Exclu du prêt

Aucun avis, veuillez vous identifier pour ajouter le vôtre !